5 dated developments from January 2025 that bear on AI compliance, each checked against the source linked. Entries are tagged by industry; the newest developments and fixed deadlines ahead are on the AI regulation news page.
Feeds (Atom): All changes · Banks and credit unions · Private equity and asset managers · Hospitals and health systems · Insurers · Employers and HR · Law firms and legal teams · Manufacturers · Importers and exporters. Data: updates.json.
The public company settled charges that it described third-party speech recognition technology as its own and overstated how much its product reduced human involvement. No penalty; the order cites financial condition, remedial acts, and cooperation.
Source: SEC, In the Matter of Presto Automation Inc., Securities Act Release No. 11352 · Guide: AI in financial services
The Division on Civil Rights issued guidance on how the Law Against Discrimination applies to automated decision-making tools used in employment, housing, public accommodations, credit, and contracting, and clarified that regulated entities may be liable for algorithmic discrimination from a tool developed by a third party.
Source: New Jersey Office of the Attorney General, January 9, 2025 · Guide: AI in hiring and HR
AB 3030 requires a disclaimer and human contact instructions on generative AI patient communications about clinical information unless a licensed or certified health care provider read and reviewed them.
Source: Duane Morris · Guide: AI in health care
SB 1120 (Health and Safety Code 1367.01; Insurance Code 10123.135) requires plan and insurer AI used in utilization review to rely on the enrollee's own clinical record, not solely a group dataset. The tool may not deny, delay, or modify care based on medical necessity; a licensed physician or competent licensed health care professional must make that determination.
Source: Fenwick · Guide: AI in health care
The policy authorizes AI use by litigants, attorneys, judges, and court staff if it complies with legal and ethical standards, says disclosure of AI use should not be required in a pleading, and requires all users to review AI-generated content before submitting it.
Source: Illinois Supreme Court Policy on Artificial Intelligence · Guide: AI compliance, layer by layer