7 dated developments from September 2025 that bear on AI compliance, each checked against the source linked. Entries are tagged by industry; the newest developments and fixed deadlines ahead are on the AI regulation news page.
Feeds (Atom): All changes · Banks and credit unions · Private equity and asset managers · Hospitals and health systems · Insurers · Employers and HR · Law firms and legal teams · Manufacturers · Importers and exporters. Data: updates.json.
S. 2937, introduced by Senators Durbin and Hawley, finds that AI systems are products and would create a federal cause of action against developers and deployers. Its latest action is referral to the Senate Judiciary Committee on September 29, 2025. It is a bill, not law.
Source: S. 2937, Congress.gov · Guide: AI compliance, layer by layer
Seven elements, from governance structures to education and training. Polsinelli describes the guidance as voluntary.
Source: Polsinelli · Guide: AI governance frameworks
In a published opinion, the Court of Appeal sanctioned counsel $10,000 and directed that the opinion be sent to the State Bar after finding 21 of 23 case quotations in the opening brief were fabricated by generative AI tools. The court warned that no filing should contain a citation the responsible attorney has not personally read and verified.
Source: Noland v. Land of the Free, L.P., No. B331918 · Guide: AI compliance, layer by layer
Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 applies from September 12, 2025, including user access rights to product and related service data and pre-contract information duties for sellers of connected products. The design duty in Article 3(1) applies to products placed on the market after September 12, 2026.
Source: Regulation (EU) 2023/2854, Article 50, EUR-Lex · Guide: AI compliance, layer by layer
A3 and ANSI announced R15.06-2025, the US adoption of ISO 10218-1:2025 and ISO 10218-2:2025 (published January 2025), revising the 2012 edition. According to A3, both parts add cybersecurity requirements and many more listed safety functions. It is a voluntary consensus standard, not an OSHA regulation.
Source: Association for Advancing Automation, September 10, 2025 · Guide: AI governance frameworks
A practitioner who uses AI for diagnostic purposes must review all AI-created records consistent with Texas Medical Board standards and disclose the use to patients. Covered entities must keep electronic health records under their control physically in the U.S. or a U.S. territory for storage on or after January 1, 2026.
Source: Texas Legislature · Guide: AI in health care
A utilization review agent may not use an automated decision system to make, wholly or partly, an adverse determination; administrative support and fraud detection uses are allowed. Applies to plans delivered, issued, or renewed on or after January 1, 2026.
Source: S.B. No. 815, enrolled, Texas Legislature · Guide: AI in health care